Psychometric properties of a physiotherapy care satisfaction scale using telerehabilitation in caregivers of pediatric patients during the COVID-19 pandemic

dc.contributor.authorGonzalez Ccosi, Jessica Liz
dc.contributor.authorPedraza Ricra, Deysi
dc.contributor.authorBasauri Delgado, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorSaintila, Jacksaint
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-04T21:02:12Z
dc.date.available2025-03-04T21:02:12Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.descriptionIndexado en Scopus. El texto completo de este trabajo no está disponible en el Repositorio Institucional UNIFE. Deberá acceder por el DOI ó URL de la casa editorial externa. Digital Health., Vol. 11, January-December 2025.
dc.description.abstractBackground: Evidence on the psychometric properties of satisfaction scales in telerehabilitation is limited, especially in specific populations such as caregivers of children. Objective: To determine the psychometric properties of a physiotherapy care satisfaction scale using telerehabilitation in caregivers of pediatric patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A total of 155 caregivers were evaluated between June and December 2020. Approximately 91% (141) were women. Evidence of content validity for the scale was obtained through evaluation by three expert judges, who confirmed the adaptation of the University of Washington Telemedicine Patient Satisfaction Survey, in which the word “telemedicine” was replaced with “telerehabilitation” and “physician” with “physical therapist.” Results: For the confirmatory factor analysis, two models were tested. The first one-factor model with nine items did not fit satisfactorily based on the goodness-of-fit indices (χ2/df = 13.96, comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.963, non-normed fit index [NNFI] = 0.951, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.290 [0.265, 0.316], and standardized root mean square residual [SRMR] = 0.178). In contrast, the second one-factor model, which involved respecification of Items 6 and 7, was considered acceptable (χ2/df = 1.60, CFI = 0.998, NNFI = 0.998, RMSEA = 0.062 [0.021, 0.096], and SRMR = 0.057). Reliability was acceptable, with a value of 0.888. Additionally, network analysis confirmed the direct relationship between the items, with Item 7 showing the greatest strength centrality. Conclusion: The instrument demonstrated sufficient evidence of validity and reliability in the Peruvian context, supporting its use with pediatric patients.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251315299
dc.identifier.journalDigital Health
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11955/1382
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85216264366&doi=10.1177%2f20552076251315299&origin=inward&txGid=902d1e6bd67e747fbb354ec0a5e3e889
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Inc.
dc.publisher.countryGB
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn: 2055-2076
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceRepositorio Institucional - UNIFÉ
dc.subjectSatisfacción del paciente
dc.subjectServicios de fisioterapia
dc.subjectTelerehabilitación
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.01.01
dc.titlePsychometric properties of a physiotherapy care satisfaction scale using telerehabilitation in caregivers of pediatric patients during the COVID-19 pandemic
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
unife.autor.afiliacionBasauri Delgado, Miguel

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: