Bolo Romero, Karla MavelGutiérrez Velasco, FlavioCórdova Berona, Helí AlejandoAlvarado Suyo, Sofía Almendra2023-08-152023-08-152023http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11955/1150Indexado en Scopus.El texto completo de este trabajo no está disponible en el Repositorio Institucional UNIFE. Deberá acceder por el DOI ó URL de la casa editorial externa.Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies; Vol. 12,N° 4; pp. 332 - 340The objective of this research was to develop a systematic review of the scientific literature between 2015 and 2022 on the relationship between digital competencies and critical thinking. In the methodological aspect, the PRISMA methodology was taken as a starting point, having chosen the Scielo, Scopus, Ebsco, and Eric databases, in English and Spanish. Neither language nor place was considered an element of exclusion. As for the results: out of 30 sources, 13 correspond to Spain with 8 publications, the rest to different countries; 18 in Spanish and 12 in English; the greatest number of publications have been in 2021 with 11; a third part has been published in SciELO; the predominant methodological approach is quantitative; 60% have an indirect relationship between the two categories; and in terms of linkage, 56% contribute to improving learning. In the discussion and conclusions: it is in Spain that there is the greatest concern for publications of this type, so most are in Spanish; it is inferred that the highest peak is 2021 due to the pandemic; the majority quantitative approach is due to the preference for quantifiable statistical data especially for the digital competencies category; the indirect relationship between the two categories is because both have different methodologies; and finally the ability for digital competencies significantly improve learning and contribute to providing solutions to different learning situations.enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/CompetenciasPensamiento críticoBibliometríaRelationship between digital competencies and critical thinking: a review of the scientific literature from 2015 to 2022info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.03.01https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2023-0119 Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studieshttps://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85166405280&doi=10.36941%2fajis-2023-0119&origin=inward&txGid=514e5bb4963a87a2c6d300e4931e0900